Comments on: Michael Jackson's son inherited his skin disorder

By: Bruiser

Bruiser — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:32:15 +0000

@Brian

Sounds like you’re the slow one. You do remember all the plastic surgery’s right?

Or don’t you think that someone who’d be willing to file their nose off wouldn’t over “lighten” their skin as well?

Quit being a cow and start thinking for yourself.

By: Stu

Stu — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:21:56 +0000

I believe there is no proof that Michael molested any boys. Seriously, have you read the facts ? Michael settled due to his insurance company forcing him. The kids testimony was completely off. They asked the kid to describe Michael’s private parts and he was not accurate.

Anyways, I am not here to support Michael.
Michael never really had any woman because he was gay. Nothing wrong with being gay. There is actually documented proof of Michael having affairs with men

By: Bryan

Bryan — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:22:50 +0000

are you slow? “vitiligo is the lame excuse” WHAT? who the hell would want to purposely lighten their skin that the shade that Michael ended up? think about it. he had a disease that thousands of other people have. why is it so hard for people to believe him when he said he had it too.

By: Beatster

Beatster — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:31:10 +0000

Yeah sure LaToya. Vitilgo is the lame excuse for Micheal wanting to be white. As for the kids, if DNA is correct wouldn’t these kids have some resemblance to Micheal closer to the young MIchael Jackson when he did look like his oroginal self. Besides he had no interest in sleeping with women. He diddled little boys and as far as I know they can’t have babies. IF these kids went to DNA testing they would find ou that Micheal’s sperm were not involved in the process at all. Maybe David Hassellhoff is the donor?